Cohuman Screencap
Whew…

It’s funny– you would think that since I’m living in NYC and surrounded by plenty of super-talented people, I’d be actively seeking them out as collaborators. The truth is I’d already met so many incredible designers, artists, editors, and feedback…ers before moving here that, well, it just seems silly to seek out unknown quantities when we live in an age that allows us to harness the internet as such powerful connective tissue.

So… Ian Nicholson, Elizabeth Bull, Lindsay Davis, Daniel King, Danton Spina, Morgan Shaw. This is my team. And I speak to them in many ways. Lindsay, as you may remember, is working on the box-art for The Rum Run, and I communicate with her primarily through Gmail. She sends me an updated design, I show it to others on Skype, then provide her with feedback over Facebook.

A few months ago, Dan King and I started doing ‘Masterplan Mondays‘ as a way to push each other as we collaborated on the TGC re-imagining of my very first game, Masterplan. So every Monday, we’d log onto Skype at 7:30 and discuss what we’d done, where we were going, and how to do it.

That died off for a bit, but then came back in full bloom with Morgan Shaw as a firey new collaborative force. Morgan originally started off giving us color advice on Shima through Gmail, and then had blown me away with his off-the-cuff reimagining of Rum Run, prompting me to put on hold the nearly-complete Redux Deluxe Edition.

So now, every Monday, we’re talking about Masterplan and Rum Run on Skype. And we’ve added new internet tools– we use Cohuman to organize tasks that need completion and showcase idea ‘testing’, and we use Dropbox to organize all of our artwork, files, rules, notes, etc. We present, discuss, refine, go off for a week, then come back. Rinse and repeat.

And for a quick fix, say, when you’re at a simple loss for words, you can source your entire social network. I couldn’t think of good names for distilleries in Rum Run, so yesterday I posted a status update on Facebook as such “Contest! I need suggestions for names of distilleries. This is for my 1920s Prohibition-era game, The Rum Run. The distilleries range in type from tents to farmhouses to cabins, and are all hidden in the forest. Here’s your chance to make BOARD-GAMING HISTORY!” Now I’ve got some excellent names to source from: Old Sol, Rotgut, Southern Spirits, and Kennedy’s to name a few.

Now here’s the REAL funny thing– with all of these feedback loops and collaboration and refinement, it takes a lot longer to actually get something done. The original Rum Run– rules, artwork, and all– took less than a month to finish. It wasn’t perfect, but it worked, and hey, it won a competition. And that ain’t nothin’. Personally, I’m thrilled with the quality product that Rum Run Redux Deluxe is turning into, along with what Masterplan will likely be a few months later. But boy, what a wait. Both of these endeavors started back in November, and here we are almost in May of the next year, still chugging along, aiming for a finished product with beautifully redesigned artwork, rules, and all sorts of bonus pieces and extra play-styles that will add hundreds of hours to the potential life of the game. In theory.

What I keep asking myself is this– is the time well spent? I enjoy this refinement process, and I love working with these people, but we live in an age that would rather get a moderately well-designed product NOW, rather than wait a couple months for something more polished. Look at youtube. Look at webcomics. Looks at flash games. Now think about the difference between that which is led by a single person, and that which is designed by committee. Andrew Stanton with John Carter, Hideo Kojima with Metal Gear Solid— these are (perhaps too) singular visions. But then on the other end of the spectrum, you have projects like, oh, say, Terra Nova.

What if I had simply declared the initial version of Rum Run as ‘good enough’ and focused all this time and energy on other new projects, and my collaborators had done their own things?

I guess it’ll take some hindsight to be able to say for certain. Right now the plan is to have everything but the rules done for the new Rum Run by the end of the month, and the game published for mass consumption before June. We’ll see…

But what do you think? In this day and age, is that extra level of polish relevant anymore? Or if people ‘get it’, is that enough?

 

 

One Response to Cohuman, Skype, Dropbox, Gmail, Facebook, Join.me, …what a world

  1. It’s something I’ve often wondered myself to be honest. ANd with digital media I’d say your assessment is spot on. However… When it comes to busting out the game box and throwing down with people IRL, I keep finding that if it doesn’t look like a finished project with some good polish to it, people just aren’t that interested in playing. I’ll have a better idea about purchase related to polish in a few months hopefully once I start actually promoting some things. But even for the sake of playtesting I’ve found that it has to look like something for others to be interested.

    There’s also a better argument for less time in development for media that are consumed more quickly. For instance, waiting a month for the next webcomic may be far too long to stay interested, even if the art is great. But most webcomics take seconds to minutes to read and then you’re done. If you hit a bad one it’s forgivable so long as the majority of the work is decent to good.

    Now, sitting down for two hours and learning a new method of interacting that requires you to do work to participate – that’s asking a lot more of the audience, and I find as a result the audience expects more from you as well.

    Even still, finding the point at which you’ve got something people will give a shot in terms of artwork, and something you’ve invested too much time in, is a skill that develops over time. Like with most elements of design it requires you to know what features of your artwork process are necessary and which add little to the experience. I’ll often recycle art through a game design because it saves time and rarely bothers people. SO in a card game, I may use the same character with a different palette on occasion, or differentiate characters but recycle backgrounds. I might use the art from one part of the game as the box art as well. Some things I’ll add shading and highlighting to while others get left rougher or flat-colored if it doesn’t hurt the “feel” of the game to do so. My TGC game “digging up trouble” uses highlights and shadows on each monster but uses the same background in every card while Viziers has a unique image on every card but remains flat-colored to look less refined and more primitive.

    Another consideration is will you be pitching the game? If so, it requires a certain amount of effort in the artwork (exactly enough to get the target company interested) but not much more (because most likely they won’t use your artwork anyway in the final product).

Leave a Reply to Big Panda Comics Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *